Tapeboard.
Highest Borrow-Fee Stocks

Highest Borrow-Fee Stocks Today: October 20, 2026 — Hard-to-Borrow Rates

JZ carries the highest borrow fee at 786.9% annualized on October 20, 2026, with 14 names in the hard-to-borrow or extreme tier across the market-wide ranking.

TL;DR: As of 10:50 PM ET on October 20, 2026, JZ carries the highest borrow fee in Tapeboard's market-wide ranking at 786.9% annualized. EZGO ranks second at 172.5% annualized, and TOPS ranks third at 91.5% annualized as of October 20, 2026.

The costliest name to borrow on a market-wide basis is JZ at 786.9% annualized as of October 20, 2026. Fees on today's list span 2.7% to 786.9% annualized; the median is 13.3%. Ultra-high rates in the triple-digit range typically flag distressed or nearly un-locatable names rather than conventional squeeze setups. The annualized borrow fee is the stock-loan cost a short seller pays to borrow shares, and it is weighted at 25% in Tapeboard's composite squeeze score alongside short interest and price momentum.

Today's Hard-to-Borrow Rate Table

RankSymbolAnnualized Borrow FeeRebate Rate
1JZ786.9%−783.1%
2EZGO172.5%−168.6%
3TOPS91.5%−87.6%
4PARA32.8%−28.9%
5ZEO26.0%−22.1%
6WKHS25.9%−22.1%
7BYND25.2%−21.3%
8FNGR23.9%−20.0%
9OPTT21.0%−17.1%
10LCID20.8%−16.9%
11SES20.7%−16.8%
12GRRR15.7%−11.8%
13OPAD13.3%−9.4%
14ATER12.6%−8.7%
15EVTL9.4%−5.5%
16SPWR6.1%−2.2%
17OCGN5.8%−1.9%
18AISP5.1%−1.2%
19CRMT5.1%−1.2%
20IMPP3.4%0.5%
21CHPT3.3%0.6%
22HIVE3.1%0.8%
23RUM3.0%0.9%
24WB2.8%1.1%
25FUBO2.7%1.2%

*Source: securities-lending rates as compiled by Tapeboard, October 20, 2026 10:50 PM ET. Market-wide ranking across all tracked securities. Not investment advice.*

Borrow-Fee Tiers

Tapeboard categorizes annualized borrow fees as normal (under 2%), elevated (2-10%), hard-to-borrow (10-50%), and extreme (above 50%). On October 20, 2026, 14 names on today's market-wide list fell in the hard-to-borrow or extreme tier.

What a High Borrow Fee Signals

An annualized borrow fee is the stock-loan cost a short seller pays to borrow shares. A high fee reflects scarcity in the lendable pool, meaning shares are difficult to locate. It does not by itself predict a short squeeze. Names with triple-digit fees are often distressed, very-low-float, post-reverse-split, or recently IPO'd stocks where shares are almost impossible to locate. High cost-to-short is not the same as squeeze potential. Borrow fee is weighted 25% in Tapeboard's composite squeeze score. See the methodology for details.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stocks have the highest borrow fees today?

JZ leads at 786.9% annualized as of October 20, 2026, followed by EZGO at 172.5% annualized and TOPS at 91.5% annualized.

What is considered a high stock borrow fee?

Tapeboard categorizes annualized borrow fees as normal (under 2%), elevated (2-10%), hard-to-borrow (10-50%), and extreme (above 50%).

Where do these borrow rates come from?

Tapeboard compiles stock-loan borrow fees daily and refreshes them each evening across the full market universe. Rates are daily, not real-time intraday, and may differ from rates at other brokers.

Data and Methodology

Borrow fee data comes from broker-dealer stock-loan data, updated daily each evening across the market-wide universe. Rebate rate data comes from securities-lending data where available. See the Short Squeeze Score ranking, the full daily archive, or the hard-to-borrow leaderboard for the live pillar.

What Changed vs the Previous Record

JZ enters the top 5 at rank 1 (786.9482% annualized) — new to the leader board. EZGO borrow fee moved from 138.5% to 172.4988% annualized since the previous record. WKHS drops out of the top 5 (was rank 5, 26.1% annualized).

This record is for educational and informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Borrow fees reflect securities-lending conditions reported in daily securities-lending data; they are not real-time intraday rates and may differ from rates at other brokers. A high borrow fee does not constitute a buy or sell signal. Short selling carries unlimited downside risk. Editor: Marcus Reilly.